I am a bit curious to know if the GRL team actually fully tested...

I am a bit curious to know if the GRL team actually fully tested the Quarry Lode targets? Hole 8 and 9 were still in sulfides at termination and the swing or deflection in those holes is of concern in my opinion. Even though assay results are pending all prior Lewis Ponds drilling completed by the GRL Team was illustrated by cross sections which generally show lift in the holes and shows how the lodes were intersected. Quite handy to the average punter. The drill rig in the previous release is quite small and pokey which I am told by a contact is in contrast to the rig used previously. Small-pokey rigs = greater hole deviation and holes terminated in sulfides is of great concern. Go back to sleep if you don't give a toss or are worried about asking the questions. If I see a photo of this small and pokey rig at Gundagai I will be getting quite cross! The trade is prospecting and are we using the proper tools?

Looks as though some of our board members are involved in kicking plenty of goals with big rigs over at Legacy Minerals and Xtract Resources. Just look at Legacy's aggressive programs and superb releases and their ground in my opinion is no where near as good as GRL's. We have a large gold and base metals resources, a true epithermal gold resource, an actual and not "spiritual" gold and copper porphyry and plenty of major gold prospects. Get on with it GRL.