Also in a simplified example, if Afterpay has $30m higher bad debt from the $1.1bn but makes an extra $100m due to the nature of their business model then Afterpay's use of $1.1bn is simply better regardless of the fact that they have higher bad debt. You can almost think of Afterpay lending to 10 different people, profiting from 10 different people while Z1P lends to 2 people and profiting from 2 people. Of course bad debt is expected to be higher for Afterpay, but so are profits.
Bad debt / TTV cuts through all that distortion... simple
Also in a simplified example, if Afterpay has $30m higher bad...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ZIP (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.36 |
Change
-0.020(1.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.532B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.38 | $1.39 | $1.34 | $24.60M | 18.09M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 45993 | $1.35 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.37 | 386131 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ZIP (ASX) Chart |