@In4apenny
PLP was a shell company on ASX. LPD bought it to shortcut the listing process. There is no point comparing PLP with LPD.
I never suggested Gary should be denied the success of his patents. He has more than 350m shares in LPD and did not pay for it in cash. His company SM for years had secured revenue stream from LPD that IS his payment.
Quoting your direct response to my concern.
" the trailing royalty portion means that an significant amount of money paid to the former owners of Bright Minz is wholly performance based: No licences sold to independent third parties, no payments made".
Whose performance are you talking about? If LPD staff can sell a license, then LPD should wholly benefit from that performance. Or are you suggesting LPD shall engage those vendors as agents to sell more licenses?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Annual Report to shareholders
@In4apennyPLP was a shell company on ASX. LPD bought it to...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $22.91M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $7.129K | 2.168M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 8371294 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.4¢ | 50178050 | 49 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 8371294 | 0.003 |
147 | 213561420 | 0.002 |
51 | 219131035 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.004 | 49248050 | 47 |
0.005 | 35995040 | 24 |
0.006 | 7766864 | 13 |
0.007 | 5666991 | 8 |
0.008 | 3127232 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
  |
Change
0.000 ( 16.7 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | 2102744 | ||
Last updated 15.59pm 03/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
LPD (ASX) Chart |