What is the motivation behind an opening such as this for a purposeful discussion, "
Bas, Bas, Bas...gosh,"?
If you intend to be dismissive, then say so. If the questions are too tricky, then say so. Patronising commentary is uncalled for, in my opinion.
Let's be very clear; I do not have or need any advice from you or anyone connected to CGB.
"
Genuine response, and really want to see you helped."
When people write or type this statement (or similar), it generally reflects the exact opposite of their intention.
"
I think it is obvious to me, and probably everyone else, that I would be wasting my time trying to answer any of your questions."
Yet another pointless response. You cannot know what is "obvious" to others. I speak for myself and do not need to try and gather a crowd with phrases like "...
and probably everyone else." Each to his own, I suppose.
However, did you have any responses to my earlier questions rather than proffering less than helpful advice? I have reposted them for your convenience.
Posted 07/10/22
And concerning post-ID
64072066
"
CGB has a lot of work to do, that is for sure, but as far as producing good quality products, they did have successes, and I have spoken with many who have enjoyed their products.
"
Q. 1
How much longer do they need to do this work, and how much more of the shareholder's money will be spent on the "work" you say they must do?
Q. 2
Where does CGB produce these products?
The word "producing" has a specific meaning and was used in the response.
Are they not simple resellers/middlemen with a massive stack of cash in the bank that, some might argue, will mainly be used for what exactly?
Q. 3
I was wondering where the CGB manufacturing/production facilities are located.
And remind me - what was noted in the PDS that heralded the "company's transformation" (I forget which version as there were about 15 or 16 revisions or so from memory) as the reasons for the millions of dollars subsequently provided by shareholders and other investors? 
