Share
1,919 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 998
clock Created with Sketch.
17/10/22
20:48
Share
Originally posted by sydneyguy:
↑
Yeah well - some of the commentary by chairman and ceo - Just like some of thier announcements since the mining lic decree imo poor But anyway - looks like a possible error in report In Relation to their tenements interest which needs clarification or correction imo Page 75-additional information for asx List of current mining and exploration tenements Monaro - claims 75 percent ( refer note 1) Monaro extension project - pr4029 and 4030 Claims 100 percent however- page 48- clear states- impairment taken of $643339- refer to note2 at bottom of page - impairment taken as they relinquished 50 percent of pr4029 and pr 4030 so that interest cannot be correct at 100 percent can it- or has the area been shrunk ? given the amount they have been paid - and the ongoing problems in court more detail of which were only recently disclosed well after suspension- these sorts of errors don’t match the salaries imv clarification of their interests - or a correction of interest in 4029 and pr4030 should be made whilst they are at it- might as well put in an explanation as to how Avz and avzi were not a party to any of the court actions- yet they dropped recently they asked a judge to delete a minute in the dathcom register -presumably as they went as dathcom - a company they apparently claim they own 75 percent of avz- avzi- dathcom if dathcom has gone to court- Avz should have informed shareholders- I don’t need pages about misleading via omission from Avz given the situation being drip fed since the trading halt anyway let see- my opinion is they are paid way tooMuch- an issue of a minute in their own dathcom register purporting to accept a sale of 15 percent to zjin by drc and we only find this out as they have a rant about boatman a month ago- mmmm
Expand
when renewing an exploration licence after 5 years under the Mining Code, you relinquish 50% Dathcom has not gone to court