Ann: Annual Report to shareholders, page-17

What 'entire project' may that be then?

There are only two options that ECT can take:

1. Make license sales of their suite of 'green' production technology to a company/companies that already have the facilities or are willing to construct them, or:

2. Raise the capital to build the facilities and go into production themselves.

In ten years the first option hasn't happened.

Regarding the second option, there is a noticeable lack of venture capital flowing in to ECT.

Why is that?

Would it be because that when the double talk is put into plain english, ECT is just another green bandwagon 'coal to chemical' startup amongst a number of companies that are doing it already or are planning to do it?