Still waiting for your response to the following, instead of the...

Still waiting for your response to the following, instead of the continuous gaslighting.
Don’t be shy now, maybe cow dung can help you to make up something?

—-

I made several clear points about that topic.

Here are the key FACTS that I noted:

- ATL made a "strategic investment" of US$5M

- AGY stated that "ATL has agreed to place its shares into a 12-month standstill period"

- A formal escrow arrangement is NOT the ONLY wayto structure such an agreement

- Lack of a formal escrow arrangement is not PROOF in itself that there was no restriction on ATL's holding.

- People who were claiming that "ATL can do whatever they want with their shares" were making a statement of fact that was NOT based on any proof; it was NOT a known fact, it was simply SPECULATION.



SIMPLE

Now, which of these clear facts due you refute?
Be specific.

—-

Come on frenchy, be specific.
These are the clear points I have made on this topic.
Now’s your chance to actually address something specific, instead of the generalised and incorrect nonsense that you have been pushing.

Why has the cat got your tongue when you need to be specific and actually address the key points.
Easier just to make comments like…
“the same old spin trying to get out of what he's been saying this whole time”
…isn’t it…?

Be specific.


I’ll wait.