I was just picking through the numbers on this report. Yes, the...

I was just picking through the numbers on this report. Yes, the design work is very good. But, the text is incredibly poor. Grammar and punctuation all over the shop. Either use someone inhouse who has studied english or get outside help

Couple of quick questions on this. I think these may just be mistakes.

Lauds
the numbers around Lauds don't make sense. Page 7 Lauds makes up 2% of PFT's revenue. Page 9 Lauds is 396k rev v 8291k total rev or 4.8% of total. New Pastures doesn't make up any difference because its only 15.8k annual sales. Page 35 Lauds is stated as using 42% of the employees by operating entity. But, the pie chart has them at about 4% or twice the size of Cashew Creamery. Page 49 Lauds is 120k rev v 7341k or 1.6% of total.

So what is Lauds revenue exactly? 120k since purchase being 1.6% of group sales, or 396k being 4.8% of group sales.

General statements
Page 9 financial highlights. "Positive EBITDA for all five business entities" but then page 49 has two entities/segments making a loss.

Page 49 and 50. There is a comparison between FY20 and FY21. But, both tables are titled "Consolidatd 2021" the table on page 50 is clearly Consolidated 20 not 21.

Page 17. The growth % is stated incorrectly. The growth is 9.6% ( or 10% rounded up ).

Just so many mistakes it is a bit worrying.