All things being equal, the Amortisation Expense should normally follow the BOE Production Numbers, as the asset/infrastructure is amortised in line with the income/production it generates.
My analysis shows that Amortisation Expense has increased from around $9 per BOE produced for 2021FY and 2022FY to $13 per BOE produced in 2023FY - almost a 40% increase.
It may be that:
a) The amortisation expense charged for 2021FY & 2022FY was understated for some reason and that a "Catch Up" was done in 2023FY.
b) The cost of the infrastructure/assets has gone up significantly due to various inflation/supply issues, with no increase in the BOE that the infrastructure/assets will produce over their life.
c) BRK have adopted an amortisation model that increases the allocation of expenses in the earlier years of a well, with a subsequent reduction in expenses in the latter years of the well.
I have asked a similar question on the Investor Website.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Annual Report
All things being equal, the Amortisation Expense should normally...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BRK (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $45.34M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 0.9¢ | $248.7K | 27.05M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
30 | 22920427 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.0¢ | 14892506 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
28 | 22814871 | 0.009 |
24 | 18394099 | 0.008 |
8 | 4333571 | 0.007 |
5 | 2251677 | 0.006 |
7 | 3258000 | 0.005 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.010 | 13892506 | 8 |
0.011 | 53686909 | 43 |
0.012 | 11754609 | 17 |
0.013 | 15654630 | 14 |
0.014 | 12176951 | 15 |
Last trade - 15.07pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BRK (ASX) Chart |