I would like to hear their justification for SW exorbitant remuneration and the decision to retain him as a consultant given his catastrophic stewardship of the company and his very poor track record. What exactly is he doing and what outcomes has he achieved? My suspicion is we would not like to hear the answer as he is probably less effective as a consultant than he was as at the top job if that is possible.
Ann: Annual Report, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 62 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
