But dear Spid, can you kindly clarify something from your post...

But dear Spid, can you kindly clarify something from your post that appears to be interesting.

As you stated:
"As I said with my previous posts, I knew the former CEO was a risk, that is why its a long term Investment, when his holding is gone i can see the company commence marketing to attract investors".

Do you mean to say you became a holder in MRC prior to the former CEO's grassy knoll dismissal and yet despite by your own admission "knowing he was a risk" and therefore you confirm you invested with a long term view and the expectation that he would be dismissed?

It seems there are things to read between your lines on this one. ZPerhaps you may wish to reword it so that it doesn't raise the question of did you have any knowledge that others were not privy to.

And what "risk" do you mean? By all accounts he did a much better job than anyone has since.

I'd say the bigger risk is salt water currently being used.