Hi all.Here is some info for those that haven't seen them.In...

Hi all.
Here is some info for those that haven't seen them.



In this one, take note of the rocks at surface that were not recognised accurately.



Here is one more for good measure.



Now for some info I picked up yesterday and in the early hrs this morning.


Nothing like a nice cap structure that can accomodate very necessary CR's for more drilling.
That calculates to around 34m shares free float.




For the non geo SH's like me, here is a pic of what they interpret below ground.
Keeping in mind that the outcrop was not identified correctly and there was a Calcrete cover.


This is a pic of the colours that one may expect to see in this type of geology.



A comparison of the Nova Bollinger to what we may have.





And here is Dundas.
There are more targets than this but this is a similar width and depth as well as depth to the top of the interpreted ore body.


The 2d modelling of NB.




Note the strike length of the interpreted gravity anomaly. 14km.




This pic has some historical holes that date back to pre NB discovery.
The tag for those that don't know BOH is Bottom of Hole.



BOH holes are of great importance when there has been no drilling to further this until now.
These pics spell it out and show a real chance of finding the goods.



I hope from this the picture is a little more clear.
The Albany-Fraser Orogen extends right underneath.



Back to the importance of the BOH mineralisation, if we use the EM as an indicator, we could expect to have very little sign of any mineralisation before a couple of hundred metres deep but this table below has come as quite a surprise.

Take a look at the depth.
From 17 to 37m in two holes.
That is a lot to be seeing at this shallow depth and leads me to think very positively about what we could be expecting at depth.



This could be exciting.
Kind regards, Wack.