Ann: ANS: Proposed $100m Placement & Strategic Investment in Sund, page-218

Extract from your post
quoted
How is that better than 50.1% sale of Cam Iron to Tidfore, particularly as that also takes 62.2% of the Congo from existing shareholders as well.

unquoted

Of course, ANS/WAPRC and SDL deals are far better than previous deals from Noteholders and Tidfore

Previously, noteholders will hold 68 per cent of SDL (at 0.004) and Tidfore will hold 51 per cent of CAM IRON SA (the subsidiary of SDL)

New deals, ANS will hold 50.7 per cent of SDL (at 0.0055) without mentioning that Tidfore will own 51 per cent of CAM IRON SA. SDL will obtain $8 million for working capital.

To reach 62.2 per cent as per your suggestion, the share price should go up to beyond 0.020 with the assumption that both ANS and noteholders will exercise their options at 0.020 which is four times than current share price of 0.005.

Surely, the SDL deals with ANS/WAPRC is far better than previous deals with noteholders. Feel sad that you do not hold any SDL shares. hehehe

If ANS/WAPRC deals with SDL do not go through or fail, the original deals with noteholders will be still valid.