Sorry missed this. That's a big question. Strategically...

Sorry missed this. That's a big question.

Strategically (applying that realistic targets policy) this is a race to the finish on batteries and we need all the expertise we currently have, and more (which we can contract, for example as with Polaris, again part of the realistic targets strategy) to maximise the patents. This latest lodgement is fantastic progress but we cannot stall now.

Right now some seem intent on a kind of scorched-earth policy, or crash or crash through scenario to justify some unproven theories about Diasource supposedly conniving to get our IP and related ideas including that Mix'n Go is a fantastic descriptor, better apparently than the recent registrations.

To this end, some are implying that Joe is surplus to requirements, when in fact we need him like never before.

You kind of hope that sanity will prevail.

(I'm not doing too well on taking a break....never mind).