Possibility is not probability. And this post is a fine example...

Possibility is not probability.

And this post is a fine example of why critics persist. What an insult to suggest that anyone not swept up in the never ending forum hype is part of some unproven shorting campaign.

Here's another possibility... Those who literally spent years on the forum arguing that ADO was crucial for POC1, and slinging mud at those who questioned their misplaced certainty, with predictions of 16 cents etc, now need an explanation for why they got it so wrong, and also need to convince retail holders to buy stock.

Enter shorting theories. Instead of acknowledging that POC1 falling through was a big blow to retail investors, precisely because years of spruiking had built up contrary expectations, and easily the most likely explanation for most of the selling. Now we are expected to believe that this sell off was manufactured based on almost no evidence.

Conveniently, a shorting theory implies that stock must be bought back, so the message is that the stock will rally sometime in future (eg if enough suckers buy into the shorting theory itself then it could become a self fulfilling prophecy). Also, extremely conveniently, the shorting theory is being linked to negative posters, as if anyone with a realistic view if both positives and negatives must be some evil moustache twisting villain.

I call BS.