Brilliantly said — totally agree with your take.
The fact that the U.S. Bureau of Mines and the Utah Geological and Mineral Survey were behind the original dataset gives this project a level of credibility you rarely find in early-stage assets. Being government-backed, their methodology was clearly conservative — no incentive to inflate, no promotional fluff, just solid, technical ground-truthing.
And you nailed the most exciting part — the entire historical resource is based only on exposed mineralisation. That means everything under shallow cover or overburden has been left out… which is exactly where the upside lies. The exploration potential is enormous.
Brilliantly said — totally agree with your take.The fact that...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
8.9¢ |
Change
0.004(4.71%) |
Mkt cap ! $97.08M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 8.7¢ | 9.2¢ | 8.5¢ | $4.694M | 52.70M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 3418000 | 8.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0¢ | 222222 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TMG (ASX) Chart |