Ann: Appendix 2A and notice under section 707(A)(5)(e), page-8

You claim I'm changing the topic. That makes no sense to me. If your assertion is that I haven't commented on the fact that shares have been issued at 4.25c which is 30% lower than 6c, well I think I have. I don't quarrel with your math. But, again: the shares were issued pursuant to an agreement signed 9 months ago.

Now, why not answer the questions I put to you. Generally I find that when I ask questions like those but they are then ignored, the person I asked doesn't have good answers to provide. Here they are again for you. You'll find I'm helpful like that.

LIT's directors hold large personal stakes in LIT. Why would they gift cheap shares to anyone?

Your original post suggests Lind are "insiders". What evidence do you have to back that up?