Ann: Appendix 3B-LWP.AX, page-88

It's possible that since circumstances changed they thought it was warranted. For example, from memory EAS has options at 2.5c that expire later this year (September??) which it seems quite unlikely will be in the money. Should EAS be held responsible because the price of oil plummeted and they basically had to try and sell the HSP product that was virtually unsellable with broader market conditions? Maybe based on this LWP thought they needed to throw them a bone?

Or you're right. It could be someone else.