I have no problems with rewards, incentives or opportunities for the board and employees. More shares, cash, even extra donoughts from the morning tea bus.
What I have an issue with is setting rewards or incentives too low where they actually become a disincentive to strive for excellence, potentially creating mediocrity.
However I've always wondered why a company would partake in a takeover if it meant most people will lose their jobs. If this is to protect and reward all for such a situation then I'm all for it, but it does depend on the take over price and anything around the strike prices would be completely unacceptable
I have no problems with rewards, incentives or opportunities for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AVE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.508M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $3.607K | 1.445M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | 102396408 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 21041400 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AVE (ASX) Chart |