The shut down comment is largely directed at
@Sector not yourself, tho you have participated from time to time. I'm willing to read informed information even if I disagree. I do appreciate your posts. Sector doesn't inform, he insults and shuts down any and all discussion. In private I think many will agree. This is not helpful. In fact I see this as harmful. Hence why I bang on about it. I get the impression that wont change.
re "comparing the incomparable" comment, any conclusion drawn from MSB improved P3 to CYP P1 is "comparing the incomparable", lets not change the facts of the discussion had. You cant compare these. one is adults, one is for children. MSB had sicker people in its cohorts. unless you want to compare to a product not progressed. That's not the product going to be approved/sold. Whats the point/relevance?
"You keep going on about trial design" yes i wanted to read the trail design, very important. yet sector has not even bothered to read it. Scary. My statements about the trial a few posts ago and its design are fair comments.
"You say because the product is consistent, I say it is consistent enough" same same, agreed. MSB can't have positive trial results without a consistent product. If its approved by the FDA its approved as it passes the stringent FDA process. A world leading process.
3D...... you both demanded a link, you both said it wasn't within MSB capability, link was provided, you all went quiet. more information has subsequently been published much to my delight, every time. You only remember the convenient parts to your story, you've clearly re-written it in you memory. which reminds me of the: "one bone marrow harvest yields 1000's of treatments" stated by MSB. Which you both claimed otherwise, until a link was given. More information has come out since. My reply to any claim from you both or anyone about manufacturing of either MSB or CYP has always been, rebutted by myself "not enough information is in the public domain to claim either way". that's a polite way of saying, "anyone claiming to know, is lying". You cant deny me that one, yet the claims stated are pumping at best.
COGS.... will it be a material difference? id say again "not enough information is in the public domain to claim either way". You claim there is, its the basis of your investment. I say again i haven't seen proof of that as "not enough information is in the public domain to claim either way"
You see on these last two points, i'm not saying your wrong, i'm saying "not enough information is in the public domain to claim either way". When you say it is, when you cant prove it because "not enough information is in the public domain to claim either way" i have a problem with that. I see that as pumping. Yet as investors, we, at some point need to make a call, sometimes this is a feel for it. My feel is, i need more information on CYP, i'm not convinced, yet.
patents... agreed, i'm not a patent lawyer. Either side claiming this may or may not be right. If you want an opinion, I think MSB has an upper hand, yet not complete coverage in all possible ways. That's a stretch. Does it have enough?, to cover the main parts, maybe. Yet this is science, ways not even conceived may not have coverage by patents of either CYP or MSB yet we will make some good coin in the interim if approved and after any patent fight.
"Given that these statements are constantly being made on the MSB thread without any evidence/sources, not causing any questions or anything." fair call, those, like myself have covered nearly every topic 10 times, I don't feel the need to fight every fire. In fact i'm not over here every day fighting every fire. I don't need to demand a source as I've already seen it with regards to MSB. I have satisfied myself enough with the information available to invest. I keenly read everything for any snippet of new information.
No need to apologise, relations would improve if shut down comments are reduced and claims toned down or stated differently in an informative way. I know I have a part to play in that. I do appreciate your posts. I gave a overview of the things that i'm looking at for future investment in CYP. These were legitimate, fair in good faith comments. I cant move the market, no-one should be worried about what i write, so the barrage is not needed.
That's enough time invested for today....
(20min delay)