Share
836 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 21
clock Created with Sketch. 29/08/14
15:57
Share
Originally posted by 618
↑
This ongoing discussion pitting PSI vs the management is nonsense, and totally off topic. As PSI has said before, he has made investment mistakes in the past. So even if PSI comes onboard, it doesn't change the investment theme for STX one iota. Given this is a public forum where we discuss what we want to discuss, there is nothing preventing a poster (any poster) from accumulating or reducing a position without disclosure. Nor do they need to do so. Not to mention everyone's risk tolerance would be vastly different, which would obviously depend on your own financial position as well as what stage of life you are in. My point is that there are so many factors behind any investment decisions that we shouldn't really dwell so much on whether someone (PSI or anyone else) is onboard or not. At the end of the day, the only outcome of importance is whether the company (and all the shareholders) makes a fortune or lose a small fortune.
Expand
PSI, is obviously a geo boffin of reasonable caliber, I know this because I can't make head nor tale of any of the tech jargon he posts, but I do welcome his input and clearly others do as well. I also like the people that challenge posters that create huge bodies of text under the pretext of enlightenment when it's actually a self gratifying wank based on less than all the facts.
(20min delay)