So let's assume that not every investor and market participant has an engineering degree, an MBA, or IT related degree and industry experience..
Is it fair to say that there comes a point where you explain to the market the benefits the Akida IP integration into the ARM Cortex M85, not just that it integrates? Would it not warrant more than one sentence if it is indeed groundbreaking?
Investors can only assume that it isn't a big deal, because it comes with zero expansion of definition or specifics on the likely potential impact to both ARM and Brainchip.
And on NDA's, BRN is named, ARM is named and the use case is named. Therefore what is there to keep a secret?
Why is it assumed information how big or small a deal this is? Why can't they at least discuss the market for that product in some detail? It just doesn't give you any confidence in the company from my view.
Shareman, TD et al are innocent on all counts until the company proves otherwise IMO.
IMO
BRN Price at posting:
38.3¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)