So let's assume that not every investor and market participant has an engineering degree, an MBA, or IT related degree and industry experience..
Is it fair to say that there comes a point where you explain to the market the benefits the Akida IP integration into the ARM Cortex M85, not just that it integrates? Would it not warrant more than one sentence if it is indeed groundbreaking?
Investors can only assume that it isn't a big deal, because it comes with zero expansion of definition or specifics on the likely potential impact to both ARM and Brainchip.
And on NDA's, BRN is named, ARM is named and the use case is named. Therefore what is there to keep a secret?
Why is it assumed information how big or small a deal this is? Why can't they at least discuss the market for that product in some detail? It just doesn't give you any confidence in the company from my view.
Shareman, TD et al are innocent on all counts until the company proves otherwise IMO.
IMO
So let's assume that not every investor and market participant...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 109 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
16.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(3.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $313.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 17.0¢ | 17.0¢ | 16.0¢ | $765.2K | 4.687M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 107 | 2575551 | 16.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 16.5¢ | 873768 | 15 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |