Wow, the patent office literally used the wikipedia definition for beneficiation.
Anyway, this looks like a standard "please explain" to my science eye. It appears they have confused the iron ore as the thing to be beneficiated, instead of the natural gas. That's on their side, but I see most of the other objections here are for clarity, which is very usual for anyone coming from a science background into the law/patent area.
Ann: Appendix 4C - quarterly & CEO Letter to Shareholders, page-12
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
30.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $69.15M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 30.0¢ | 30.5¢ | 30.0¢ | $119.6K | 397.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 241048 | 30.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 30.5¢ | 57431 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 20/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HZR (ASX) Chart |