Ann: Appendix 4C - quarterly-LWP.AX, page-70

The request for proof is reasonable and would allow shareholders to be certain about the prospects for LWP. On the flip side the request is being made of persons that no longer hold, who are not obligated to take any risks in support of new and existing holders. To divulge private correspondence in a public forum without the permission of the writer would be inviting legal action. Even if the case is fully defensible, who wants that hassle on their agenda.
Share holders are left to make judgements on publicly available information such as

Huge dilution, over 2 billion shares will have been issued if LWP completes its current plans. (Sum all the recent placements to staff, VVV, VVV costs, SOPHS, Lanstead, Directors)

Why does a fully funded company need this cash.

LSP prospects which appear the initial reason for the revival of interest in LWP are still not fully proven. Still waiting for ISO 13503-5, seriously a no brainer even if only to satisfy share holders the product is viable.

Where is the independent proof that Viktor Volkov is a legitimate scientist, no one has been able to find this to date.

The patents LWP have purchased are provisional and as such are subject to dispute by parties that hold similar bodies of work. Similar bodies of work are known to exist

Why have so many strong supporters left the forum or stock. Some have stated their reasons, others have simply stopped posting.

If the news flow from LWP was accepted as credible by shareholders, the share price would not be languishing at .4c.

The market knows best