It looks like most of your questions are dealt with at least to...

@Tumby is the first response to your assertations last time, i'll post the second - but you didn't respond to either of them

I contacted Oleg Vormik and he directed me to the following document on DRO's website.

https://www.droneshield.com/counterdrone-handbook
Tumby you may now wish to comment on this in detail as a reasonable response to your questions. Incidentally, I note the comment you attach to your status.

Originally posted by Tumby: ↑

Ask them why they did not use a NATA certified lab for human exposure tests,
were the tests conducted using all ISM frequencies and at what power levels,
Ask them about gaining an exemption for FCC compliance, chances?
Ask how they deal with threats outside of ISM frequencies,
Ask how they deal with drones using automated gps,
Ask them about effective range on kiddy type drones and commercial types,
Ask how they deal with drones using directive array rear facing antennas,
Ask them is the equipment meets warsaw conventions on electromagnetic exposure limits.
Ask them if they have a real bonafide business.

It looks like most of your questions are dealt with at least to some degree. Personally I would not expect the company to divulge every detail of how they do what they do, in fact that would be counterproductive.