It's been really interesting reading the above string. It seems...

It's been really interesting reading the above string. It seems no-one has any idea what the right valuation for this company is. It ranges anywhere from 3.8c to 65c. Someone even thought $5.00! There are no solid and verifiable fundamentals to go on at all. Just speculation.
Downrampers are accused of all sorts of crimes against humanity by pointing out some truths about NET's obvious shortcomings. Uprampers are accused of crazy wishful thinking about NET's prospects when all they want is make a profit.
My view for what its worth:
I know nothing about the quality of the technology. In this space I reckon tech development is warp speed and if you can't get your product to market real quick, you never will.
The Chinese market is extremely opaque and the Chinese have made IP theft an art form. The potential market is huge, but getting genuine ROI is a whole different ball game. If they can steal IP from the big American and European companies, NET has no chance.
Extravagant announcements are frequent and almost always lead to nothing. It's always the next big thing, the next country, the next JV, the next product, the next business strategy, the next quarter. How about some profits from existing products? They've been flogging VINs for years now, we are told, and still nothing.
Business plans and revenue forecasts have proved worthless and management has repeatedly failed to deliver on any financial metric.
The fixation on sales is dumb. Sales do not equate to profits. Period. Especially in a start-up, high tech world where development capex is huge and on-going.
There have never been any profits. Hence cap raise follows cap raise, on increasingly desperate terms. Shareholders have been diluted on an epic scale.
Management has been unstable with continuous churning of directors. Reporting and comms to shareholders have been diabolical.

I've tried, but it's hard to think of anything positive to say about NET that's really solid and factual. Almost all the points raised predicting a surge in SP are no more than hope that management will actually do what it says it will do and the product is going to start flying off the shelves. No-one has pointed out any fundamental factor that will generate a sustainable NPAT that underpins a rising SP. It's all guessing and speculation so far. Nothing wrong with that in a forum like HC, but let's be honest about what it is.
As for me, I just want to get back to breakeven then I'm outta here. Show me the money!