Also, the reason why the La Trobe debt is completely different...

Also, the reason why the La Trobe debt is completely different from the aforementioned $100m debt is that the La Trobe debt is residential level debt (ie. affordable, consumer-range interest rates). If you've read any of Arthur's updates you'd have seen him talking about DCL seeking resi-level debt as the final piece of the puzzle, therefore indicating that the earlier debt wasn't appropriate for residential property investments!

Once again, your posts have cherry-picked information and misled HC readers, knowing that many haven't read the updates nor the announcements.

Also, are you saying that DCL missed the boat because property prices may go down?

1. You think property will become an obsolete investment because there may be a short-term downturn? That DCL has missed the boat to property investing because Sydney house prices may go down? Bahahaha luckily you're an accountant, not a financial advisor.

2. Do you know when the best time to invest in property is? During a downturn! DCL is only approaching $50m FUM now and there's billions of FUM left to grow, so during the downturn I'd expect DCL to explode in popularity as people who still have the ability to invest in property (but can't afford to buy an entire property) realise that it's an incredible time to invest in property and flood DomaCom. Thanks for bringing this fact up, another strong meta-theme for DCL's massive future growth!