Excuse the delay...busy day...good fun tough.
Anyway, as I said...you're clueless re umbrella contracts. There are many ways to get out of a supply contract be it express or flexible if that's what one party chooses. Neither of us have the specifics of the NUH/HP contract. So any debate on point is pretty worthless as we don't have the contract nor are we privy to penalty or dissolution provisions and the like and even if we did, it then becomes a debate in law...a task which you are clearly incapable of.
I do concede there is an imbalance in power relationships as between any major multinational and a TP supplier (whether small or huge)...but that's the way of the world and nothing unique to NUH. HP has many partnerships...it's part of their corporate culture and you can try and demonise or weaponise these facts as much as you like, but the facts simply don't support your claims.
Anyway, I simply pointed out that the purpose of such common commercial contracts (so common in fact as to have their own name...you know..."umbrella"). I really can't put it more plainly to even one as challenged as you appear to be. I suggest if you want to educate yourself, you either DYOR or get professional legal advice. But please stop posting BS about a topic you are likely intentionally blind to or, as I said...challenged.
As to the 3.7 mill
they've already paid that to NUH to develop the HP Elite Bud!
What's gone deathly quiet on the Elite Buds exactly?...the fact that they'll be bundled with a second range of the HP laptops, or perhaps the fact that there's a chip shortage which is causing Toyota to wind down 40% of it's car production as I've already cited...yes Covid delays dummy...honestly your level of bovine deceitfulness is breathtaking. To put it another way, there is no deathly silence apart from the space between your ears Pigsy.
No not everybody knows that about back door listings because your FOS as i'I demonstrated...is that your attempt at reverse psychology DH? The reason the ASX put a stop to them was to punish the old directors of the Co that had put the Co's into administration in the first place...I also suspect so that the ASX could ensure their own fees weren't undermined...wink, wink.
As to the NSX option (that's a total crack-up)...how many Co's are listed there have they hit 50 yet versus ASX roughly 2,200 listings? So was the NSX around when NUH listed five years ago? Allow me to school you again...NO THEY WEREN'T dummy...NSX only started listing a month or two ago so it wasn't even an option...maybe I should repeat it to help you understand it better...
IT WASNT AN OPTION! So why raise it?...because it's cheaper to list on the NSX? Mate I haven't checked what it costs to list on the NSX as I don't care.
Anyway who cares right?...you hate specs don't you?... and yet here you are the most prolific of all posters here for some time now and who mysteriously has no financial interest in NUH hmmm?
Uh huh...Yeap...makes perfect sense...your credibility ranks up there...that's for sure....
I can't even believe I'm bothering to engage with you...but you're like a train wreck...no-one wants to look, but they just can't help themselves.
Ohhhhh...and then just to cap it all off...you again for the umpteenth time raise the number of Co's that have gone broke that took up the option of back door listing originally based on the two articles you cited and which clearly don't state that at all!!!! Not one scintilla of evidence...just a cloud of methane. See...just coz' you say it a thousand times doesn't make it so...fool!
What the hell does Mike Cannon-Brookes have to do with the topic? Is he perhaps a statician that's published on point?...
give us a citation because I'm not getting drawn into your worthless commentary especially after the last two citations you provided which only proved your deceptiveness.
Waiting for that scintilla bubs....chortle...
(20min delay)