Information has been sketchy, generating speculation. As a possible scenario, would it be in the interests of the refinery (PMC), once the process has been proven, to "go slow" and hoard their feedstock until the 5 year access period is over and the nickel recovery plant becomes their property? The capital costs can then be paid out of nickel proceeds unless MFC want to face major legal costs in a foreign jurisdiction. I emphasise again this is sheer speculation based on insufficient information.
If there are better informed folk out there, your thoughts are most welcome.
BB.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MFC
- Ann: Appendix 4E - Preliminary Final Report
Ann: Appendix 4E - Preliminary Final Report , page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MFC (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online