@immortalcombat .... There has been a lot of work on activated...

@immortalcombat ....

There has been a lot of work on activated taking ozone out of the air, as in air with pollutant ozone in it, NOT high levels created by an ozone generator. The ozone changes the chemical makeup of the carbon fairly quickly, which stops it from absorbing the ozone...

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/87t73704

"The filter banks with prefilters containing activated carbon were removing 60% to 70% of the ozone 67 and 81 days after filter installation."

The FRG unit will be making high levels of ozone in ambient air, which is the air in indoor spaces!! Any activated carbon filter will be quickly rendered useless, with increasing amounts of ozone released into the indoor space.

The above link is using just ambient polluted air 'smog' with ozone in the ppb range, but after 60-80 days had declined in effectiveness.

The FRG unit is going to be producing ozone in the PPM range, as in vastly greater concentrations than 'smog' type ozone pollution. Any type of activated carbon filter is only going to be effective for a VERY short time, if at all..

Don't you ever wonder why, year after year the company doesn't have any type of 'air purifier' available for sale??? Perhaps it is because they can't get the ozone levels down to acceptable levels for any type of constant useage, without using some type of expensive catalyzing agent (not activated carbon) to remove ozone!!

Don't you realise that a host of other ozone generators already for sale, none are suggested for occupied indoor spaces and none have managed to make a cheap enough filter/catalyzing agent that reduces ozone to acceptable levels. Now you expect a company with no cash, using borrowed funds to come up with a solution, that no-one else has cracked..