eh?
Your logic is entirely illogical.
Giving them shares instead of cash means:
1. less cash drain
2. greater incentive to perform
3. they get 'paid' less if they don't perform
If their rem is expressed in cash, but the company doesn't have much cash, that doesn't mean the directors go hungry. It just means they need to find cash somewhere, eg via a (discounted) raise or by borrowing.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.155M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.0¢ | 2.0¢ | 1.9¢ | $12.39K | 620.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 421000 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 286349 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.30am 18/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ACR (ASX) Chart |