Seems like your beiing bit selective: [ATTACH] So I went back...

Seems like your beiing bit selective:



So I went back through the annual reports to double-check. Turns out, Jason's been pulling in numbers pretty much identical to Jennifer's—right in line with her salary year after year.

Talk about confirmation bias. You're so emotionally invested in defending the company that you can't even see it. Remember when you said, 'Jennifer had to go because the company couldn’t afford her, her salary was out of step with a company of this size'? Well, Jason's been pocketing nearly the same for years. Funny how that works."

New all time lows again today as I predicted, yet you got Jason taking out over 10% of the companies market value in annual salary! So yes, to use your words salaries are out of step with a company of this size!

This is a big reason why the company has been diluted at ALL time lows and is trading at new ALL time lows again today. Wake up. Atleast IMU holders are waking up and voting against remuneration report that Paul puts forward (giving him the ASX dreaded first strike) time holders here do the same to save the company.