The additional $2m under SPP is not significant but to ensure...

The additional $2m under SPP is not significant but to ensure shareholders did not complain they were left out of a raise. If the SPP is underwhelming it is arguably better for everyone as less dilution , and surely $10m is enough cash to spend on getting more scale or alternative income streams.

I am surprised in watching the CEO her ambition is to continue to drag market share from what she described as the big 4 and to be independent

I am not sure what she is looking to be independent of when using that language.

If they drop to 35 I might buy back in what the annual accounts highlight in regards to cost of sale, employment costs and cash flow from operations on record volumes.