Ann: Application for quotation of securities - TMG, page-7

@Tarly123
Seems you've gone a bit quiet... maybe you don't have cell reception to get on the internet and reply.

Anyways, I thought I'd just provide some more information to back up my so-called 'fake information.' See the picture below.

Now, let's dissect your initial reply to my message while publicly calling me a liar and discredited my reputation.

1. Dude are you incapable of posting correct information - No, I am capable of posting correct information.
2. You have posted several incorrect information in your attempts to purposely and maliciously downramp the stock - Wrong. I've posted one piece of false information by accident, which I have acknowledged was wrong. Unfortunately, I can't edit my post. But it seems everyone already knew it was false, so no harm done.
3. It does not work so find another stock to post fake information about - Just imagine someone actually thinking that a post on a public forum is going to affect the price of a stock. Haha.
4. As this is considered illegal as it’s a repeat offence - I'd be worried about yourself - you only seem to bring up or post information that suits your agenda, i.e., pumping the stock.

Seems like the other three people who liked your post - whose names I can see from the activity stream - don’t fact-check or do their own research either. This happens across many forums: people like posts that are pumping the stock or suit their own agenda and gang up on or talk down to those who share different views, regardless of whether the information they’re providing is actually correct.

Don't bother commenting on every other thread to push this post down the page - I’ll be back here Monday morning to bring it back to the top for everyone to see.

It takes a bigger man to stand up and admit when he's wrong.

Talk soon,
Slim