Ann: Appointment of a New Non-Executive Director, page-25

father D the company has known since 2006 that uranium was the problem and did nothing about that .
surely its up to the people to decide if they want something or not and they said no ,the arguments about lost money are therefore meaningless they assessed that and voted. now both main parties have said they will not go back. i see it as rather like the daylight saving case in WA it may make good sense but the people have said no 4 times. move on to the non uranium bits which is clearly what the company is at last doing.