Exactly and the bulk of them he had when he made those comments in 2017. I have no doubt he was not happy with the No vote and is not happy with the performance of his investment, however obviously he has not liquidated his holdings after the no vote, although that may have been problematic in itself due to the size of holding. My point is, he is now a Director with a charter to work in the best interest of all holders and I am curious how he sees he can help move this forward. The question is, whether he intends to try and assist CTP in the long term or advocate short term remedies (as previously stated) to try and claw back some lost capital. (Aren't you curious??) Perhaps previous comments were just rhetorical trying to advocate a yes vote, however they were pretty blunt which makes a legitimate question in regard whether this is another "short term" play or not!!
CTP Price at posting:
9.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
