I totally agree that the problem with PAN is the mis-representation. We are all aware of that it is a high risk and high return play subject to the macro conditions and would only invest as much as one could afford to lose. However, going into VA only 2 months after a CR is something needs to be explained. Did they do a CR when they were fully aware of the high probability of VA?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Appointment of Voluntary Administrators
I totally agree that the problem with PAN is the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 90 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAN (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $103.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PAN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
INF
INFINITY LITHIUM CORPORATION LIMITED
Ryan Parkin, Managing Director & CEO
Ryan Parkin
Managing Director & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online