It’s concrete. Thanks for your concern. Have you access to DC’s remuneration and the corporations Act? Then also considered the 120m returned shares. Have you looked at anything we have stated.
- 120m shares concrete. Further, let’s not mix words here, they are questions, and you can hire the best lawyers in the country and have all the money you want.
But a fact is a fact. Revert Corporations Act; Section: 180, 181, 182, 183, 674, 1041H, 1041A, 710, 300A, in amongst several RG’s and ASX obligations. Dont think for a moment this is just a 5 minute rant. It has been discussed and information collected over years, collated and clearly outlined.
If we take your view, then we follow your logic and as outlined in your post…DC has responded and through risk analysis, this means what exactly? Have you read their risk guidance in the AR24? Page 28-30. Please inform us where you read, carelessness or oversight? If not either of these, we have allowed them to explain, to correct us. Yet they have not to date. What I have not done is published there watered down response that is unrelated to questions asked.
That response you refer, was the response, and let me be absolutely clear, that was not remotely near the answers to answer the questions asked. I am hoping there is a response. But for now, I reserve my judgement, and existing findings remain true.
How do you explain 120m shares handed back to shorters? The board or Canaccord?
What metric have you used to suggest we be silent and voicing a concern is illegal?
DC, has spoken you all must listen. I didn’t read that in any law books.
(20min delay)