Ann: Arbitration - Filing of the Statement of Claim, page-55

For those that are new here. Allow me to realign any gibbers misinformation.
ETMs EIA was passed by both legislative departments, appointed to do so on the governments behalf, in both Greenland and Denmark. All to the highest international standards (IAEA)
Further, as we see from the recent announcement. ETM pursues a contractual arrangement in which the Greenlandic government has apparently breeched. Agreeing approval was forth coming due to such compliance. This has been backed by a suite of solicitors seemingly keen for an easy slice.
It seems that GBB owns the mine next door. Supplying a competitive (yet in my opinion. A very inferior eudialyte product). He obviously appears uncomfortable with this fact and clearly claims otherwise to it. Absent any proof. Isnt that unusual? Or is it for competition to try claim, Maybe in the hopes ETM would fail.. I Ill let you decide and just offer these facts..
Most of us here would like to remind you. The ignore button is available too.