AVZ avz minerals limited

Ann: Arbitration Proceedings Update, page-44

  1. 9,272 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 18992
    My theory is relatively simple. If you recall, a while back FIRB would not allow Yibin Tianyi to increase its stake in AVZ because it was contrary to the National Interest - refer Post #: 44241094

    I suspect that would be the same outcome if a Chinese entity sought to takeover AVZ, but I also wonder what would FIRB have to say about AVZ selling its stake in Dathcom? Not tested, but I would have thought AVZ could offload its stake in Dathcom if it wanted to and then dissolve AVZI (which holds the stake in Dathcom) but keep AVZ listed, but taht is a guess as ultimately I don't know how FIRB operates.

    When you steal something however, remember you don't pay true value as well LOL. But yes, take your point - why doesn't the 'Chinese' entities concerned simply not buy out AVZ's share in Dathcom given the long term benefits to China of Manono itself.

    Anyway, not sure why either as to your question, but better have a VB as it might give me some clarity later on

    IMO IMO
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.