And who then contributes the development costs associated with that 15%?
When (if) AVZ goes for capital raise or seeking finance or selling a portion of the project ownership, does the question of this 15% not raise questions or concerns for the potentially incoming parties at those times?
I feel ALL %s in the project require complete confirmation and that might be why AVZ are keen to continue to participate in this arbitration process.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Arbitration Update
Ann: Arbitration Update, page-111
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online