Ann: Arrowsmith North Environmental Approval Update, page-133

Interesting.

And what of the substantial shareholders too? The more I read the back story of this stock the more murky the picture gets unfortunately, IMO.

What management are trying to achieve now via their tenements isn’t really something of a concern, again IMHO, but how certain parties, including management and substantial shareholders, especially those of the past, may have or did benefit from the securing and or offloading of those current tenements definitely should warrant a further look over.

I have mentioned previously it does seem somewhat convoluted to me that certain members here want to continually disparage Mr. Maulish for his…whatever you want to call it, but yet none of the substantial holders are voicing any concerns regarding him, are they? I wonder why that may be…