Ann: ArTiMist Appeal Reasons For Decision, page-37

Maybe if SC had followed WHO's request in the first place and applied for approval via FDA or EMA the outcome may have been different.
Had they had followed up with WHO as they stated they were going too.

How can SC get away with what he has announced so many times around the expected outcome of the MAA.

This announcement put out by Hopper smells of a complete cover up and if ASIC where doing their job they would immediately investigate the actions of SUDA but no as per normal they don't care about the small end of town.
IMO SC should have to answer the questions that the decision raises, but no he walks away scott free.

Hopper hasn't come clean, if he did we would be told what questions did TGA ask, what answers were given, based on theses why did SUDA appeal. How based on the outcome can he still say what a great job SC had done.


Cover up from the start and the cover up continues