But ASX Regulatory Guide (RG 5.286) says a substantial holding disclosure is required when:
(b) has a substantial holding and there is a movement of at least 1% in their
holding
2.545 mio shares are more than 1%. Therefore if it had been TBR, they would have had to announce it.
Furthermore I think that Mr. Billis would also have had to issue a "change of director´s interest notes" in case TBR had sold.
Both did not happen. Therefore I stick to my opinion that it was not TBR who sold.
But ASX Regulatory Guide (RG 5.286) says a substantial holding...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RND (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.49 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $84.46M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1830 | $1.37 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.49 | 398 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RND (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable