But ASX Regulatory Guide (RG 5.286) says a substantial holding disclosure is required when:
(b) has a substantial holding and there is a movement of at least 1% in their
holding
2.545 mio shares are more than 1%. Therefore if it had been TBR, they would have had to announce it.
Furthermore I think that Mr. Billis would also have had to issue a "change of director´s interest notes" in case TBR had sold.
Both did not happen. Therefore I stick to my opinion that it was not TBR who sold.
But ASX Regulatory Guide (RG 5.286) says a substantial holding...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.71 |
Change
0.005(0.29%) |
Mkt cap ! $96.97M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.70 | $1.71 | $1.70 | $13.58K | 7.993K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3253 | $1.70 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.75 | 485 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.53pm 01/08/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RND (ASX) Chart |