so waht you are saying is that all those monies were paid to FP - where does it actually state that in the report?. "Related Parties" are any parties related to the officeholders are they not?. So the payments could be an aggregation of amounts paid as salary or other to officeholders and/or their related entities - is that not correct?. Also includes officehlders that had resigend in the previous 6 months.
so you are completely sure that the full amount of those monies were paid to FP and/or his related entities?.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- Ann: ASIC Supplementary Submission to Senate Inquiry
Ann: ASIC Supplementary Submission to Senate Inquiry, page-97
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 194 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable