Ann: Assay results confirm extensive mineralisation at Cangai, page-35

Going all silly is the first sign you have lost the argument, old son.

You know very well there is more drilling to come, so this is just pointless bleating by yourself on only a portion of the exploration. Why would you do that? A: scaremongering. Taking up a contrarian argumentative position as you do on other threads. You can see on Pg 3 of the release that the last drill holes have more accurately defined the Sellars lode, which is but one of many. Stop talking as though the whole site's viability rests on these 7 holes - it doesnt.

Wrong. Many explorers derive an inferred resource which can be calculated without any significant drilling, just by EM loop surveying for example. Realise that after some or total drilling, the inferred category may become indicated(more accurate), or measured (most accurate). Even a JORC measured resource calculation is still a best guess, you realise that, dont you?

In summation, wait until all the drilling plans are completed and assays are released, then you are in a position to assess whether the project is a flop. Doing it now, just makes you look.....