@seals
The announcement says Hole 303 = 40m @ 1.64% Cu from surface
If you go to the table on page 25 of the announcement and estimate a length-weighted average grade for the hole 303 intercepts you come up
with only 40m @ about 1.28% Cu.
Perhaps the intervals have also been weighted by density?????
It can also be seen from the table that the first 21m are dross (~0.1% Cu) just as in hole 301.
Do you think it is reasonable to announce "potentially economic intercepts from surface" with grades of 0.1% Cu for the first 20 - 30m?
Ann: Assays Confirm Major Copper Discovery at Big One Deposit, page-68
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 252 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CCZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.797M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1055000 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6¢ | 3984328 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CCZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable