@seals
The announcement says Hole 303 = 40m @ 1.64% Cu from surface
If you go to the table on page 25 of the announcement and estimate a length-weighted average grade for the hole 303 intercepts you come up
with only 40m @ about 1.28% Cu.
Perhaps the intervals have also been weighted by density?????
It can also be seen from the table that the first 21m are dross (~0.1% Cu) just as in hole 301.
Do you think it is reasonable to announce "potentially economic intercepts from surface" with grades of 0.1% Cu for the first 20 - 30m?
@sealsThe announcement says Hole 303 = 40m @ 1.64% Cu from...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 252 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
