T92 3.45% 6.0¢ terra uranium limited

Yeah but PEN isn't looking for uranium in Canada...Its Lance...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 140 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 16
    Yeah but PEN isn't looking for uranium in Canada...Its Lance project has previously been in production (albeit produced f* all):
    Lance Projects Quarterly Production
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5568/5568312-90ba1ce397e9cdf194e25aa5492e8a04.jpg
    The deposit isn't that big and ISR is finicky; the economics for getting the mine restarted were always dubious. After UEC recently pulled the pin on giving PEN access to its processing mill, PEN is now forced to develop a mill in-house – making the numbers look even worse (or fwiw imo making the restart completely unfeasible unless the price of U308 truly moons).

    Anyway PEN is a junior developer with a past producing mine in the US Lower 48. T92 is a junior explorer in the Athabasca Basin. Surely the fairer/more useful comparison in terms mc etc would be with 92E (another ASX-listed junior looking for uranium in the Athabasca)?
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add T92 (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.